Question 30. Choose a, b, c or d as the best answer. 30. The author’s main argument is that __________.

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

The central idea is that the harm caused by cyclones is not inevitable and can be lessened through specific actions, so the correct answer is d. the damage that cyclones cause can be reduced.

Relevant knowledge points and concepts:
- Distinguish between a main argument (author’s thesis or central claim) and supporting points (facts, examples, recommendations).
- Look for thesis signals: topic sentences, conclusion paragraphs, recommendations, modal verbs like “can,” “should,” “must be reduced,” or descriptions of preventable outcomes.
- Differentiate descriptive statements (what is) from prescriptive/argumentative claims (what can or should be done).

Step‑by‑step reasoning:
1. Identify thesis cues: the author likely makes claims about causes and then moves to solutions or mitigation. A main argument that damage can be reduced shows up as recommendations or a concluding claim that loss is preventable with measures.
2. Examine each choice against that standard:
   - a. “climate change is real and must be prevented.” This is a broad policy claim about climate change itself. If the passage focused on cyclone preparedness and specific mitigation, this is too general and mismatches the likely emphasis.
   - b. “communities must learn how to avoid cyclones.” Avoidance of cyclones is unrealistic (natural storms cannot be avoided); an author making practical recommendations would talk about reducing damage rather than avoiding storms entirely.
   - c. “cyclones cause a lot of destruction to communities.” This is a factual observation and might be part of the passage, but it is descriptive rather than the author’s main argumentative thrust.
   - d. “the damage that cyclones cause can be reduced.” This is prescriptive and actionable: it asserts that negative outcomes are reducible and implies solutions—matching a typical author’s main argument when giving mitigation strategies.

Why d is correct:
- It states a clear, arguable thesis that motivates evidence and recommendations (e.g., early warning systems, resilient infrastructure). It both acknowledges the problem and offers a hopeful, actionable conclusion that aligns with an author’s persuasive goal.

Why the others are incorrect (brief):
- a is too broad and shifts focus to climate change prevention rather than cyclone damage mitigation.
- b is unrealistic and misframes the solution as avoidance instead of resilience.
- c is merely descriptive, not the author’s prescriptive/main argumentative claim.

Conclusion: therefore the author’s main argument is best represented by choice d, confirming the provided answer.

Question 30. Choose a, b, c or d as the best answer. 30. The author’s main argument is that __________.Single choice

Similar Questions

Choose the correct letter, a, b, c, or d. 10. The purpose of the article is to

The Athletic Director's LAST NAME is _______.

Match the sentences/phrases on the left, with an appropriate item on the right, to form coherent messages. 1: コンサートを楽しみにしていた。 2: ドイツと言えば、 3: 私の新しい仕事は給料がとてもいい。 4: 彼は来月結婚するそうだ。

Choose a, b, c or d as the best answer. 2. Which statement would the author, most probably, agree with?

More Practical Tools for Students Powered by AI Study Helper

Homework AI Solver

Stylized AI Paper Writer

Plagiarism Checker Assistant

Citation AI Academic Writing Tool

In-Class Translation Assistant

AI Note Generator

AI Quiz Answers

Past Exam Questions from University Test Bank

Smart Practice Assistant

Adaptive Practice

Making Your Study Simpler