Boyne argues public and private management differ fundamentally. Which scenario best illustrates this difference?

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

Boyne's central claim emphasizes "publicness": public management must reconcile efficiency and managerial techniques with uniquely public obligations—democratic accountability, political oversight, equity, transparency, and multiple conflicting goals—whereas private management typically focuses on profit, market competition, and a clearer single bottom line.

Relevant knowledge points and concepts:
- Publicness: obligations to citizens, elected officials, and the public interest.
- Multiple goals: public organizations pursue service, equity, fairness, and legitimacy as well as efficiency.
- Accountability mechanisms: democratic accountability, public scrutiny, legal constraints, and political responsiveness.
- Private-sector focus: profit maximization, shareholder value, competitive markets, and managerial autonomy.

Step-by-step reasoning:
1. Compare each option to the publicness criteria. A scenario that most clearly shows a manager balancing efficiency with democratic accountability directly exemplifies the tension Boyne highlights.
2. Option A (nonprofit focusing solely on profit maximization) contradicts typical nonprofit and public goals; it represents a private-profit orientation, not public management.
3. Option B (private firm adopting stakeholder engagement for legitimacy) shows a private organization borrowing public-style practices, but its core incentives remain market-driven—this does not illustrate the fundamental institutional differences Boyne stresses.
4. Option C (government department balancing efficiency with democratic accountability) explicitly names both managerial aims (efficiency) and public obligations (democratic accountability). That duality is the characteristic tension Boyne argues differentiates public from private management.
5. Option D (public agency prioritizing cost-cutting over service equity) shows a public entity acting like a private firm (emphasis on cost-cutting), but it highlights a deviation from public values rather than the intrinsic structural tension between efficiency and public accountability.

Why the correct answer is correct:
Option C captures the inherent dual responsibilities of public managers—improving performance while remaining democratically accountable—exactly the fundamental difference Boyne argues. Other options either mischaracterize organizational types or show surface borrowing of practices rather than the institutional contrast.

Final confirmation: The correct answer is "A government department balancing efficiency with democratic accountability."

Boyne argues public and private management differ fundamentally. Which scenario best illustrates this difference?Single choice

Similar Questions

Which of the following options is NOT a function of Immigration New Zealand: (1 mark)

根据讲座内容，关于公共管理者，下列哪些说法是正确的？

According to the lecture, which of the following are true about public administrators?

Which of the following scenarios best illustrates a core structural difference between public and private organisations?

Woodrow Wilson's contribution to public administration emphasised the need for:

Administratively, where does the agency from Question 5 reside?

{Transport Canada Personnel Structure} What is the title of the position within Transport Canada for the person who is assigned to a specific approved organization?

As part of its new strategy, the Port Authority aims to position itself as a:

More Practical Tools for Students Powered by AI Study Helper

Homework AI Solver

Stylized AI Paper Writer

Plagiarism Checker Assistant

Citation AI Academic Writing Tool

In-Class Translation Assistant

AI Note Generator

AI Quiz Answers

Past Exam Questions from University Test Bank

Smart Practice Assistant

Adaptive Practice

Making Your Study Simpler