A major hypothesis that nutritionists have concerning the increase in Type II diabetes in the U.S. over the past 50 years is:

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

To approach this question, I will evaluate each answer option in light of the major hypothesis discussed by nutritionists regarding the rise in Type II diabetes in the U.S. over the past several decades.

Option 1: 'For many reasons the population has become more obese, which often leads to Type II diabetes'
This option aligns with the widely discussed hypothesis that increasing obesity rates contribute to higher incidence of Type II diabetes. Obesity is a well-established risk factor for insulin resistance and beta-cell stress, which can lead to Type II diabetes. The general mechanism involves excess adiposity contributing to metabolic dysfunction, inflammation, and impaired glucose tolerance. This makes sense as a leading explanation for the observed rise in diabetes.

Option 2: 'The increase in the consumption of meat has increased diabetes'
While some studies examine dietary patterns and their relationship to diabetes, the dominant hypothesis emphasized by nutritionists recognizes obesity, sedentary lifestyle, and metabolic syndrome as primary drivers. Singular emphasis on meat consumption as a causal factor is overly simplistic and not the core prevailing explanation; it ignores the broader context of caloric balance, obesity, and fat distribution, as well as evidence showing varying effects of meat depending on preparation and overall diet quality.

Option 3: 'The increase in the consumption of pectins, gums, and mucilages (soluble fibers) has increased diabetes'
Soluble fiber intake is generally associated with improved lipid profiles and glycemic control, and there is not a consensus view that increased soluble fiber consumption would cause a rise in Type II diabetes. This option runs contrary to prevailing nutrition science, which tends to emphasize fiber as protective against metabolic disturbances rather than a contributor to diabetes risk.

Option 4: 'The increase in the popularity of sports shoes has also increased diabetes'
This option is incongruous with scientific understanding. The popularity of athletic footwear has no plausible mechanistic link to the incidence of Type II diabetes. It appears to be a distractor with no biological basis in metabolic disease etiology, and it does not fit with the nutritionist perspective on diabetes risk.

In summary, when comparing options, the reasoning behind the obesity-related hypothesis (Option 1) is the most consistent with the major nutritionist hypothesis for the rise in Type II diabetes, while Options 2, 3, and 4 rely on less supported or implausible connections between diet or lifestyle factors and diabetes risk.

A major hypothesis that nutritionists have concerning the increase in Type II diabetes in the U.S. over the past 50 years is:单项选择题

类似问题

According to the slides, Nauru's population has/had the highest _ and ___ rates on the planet!

Obesity is a significant risk factor for which of the following conditions?

A project has a required return of 12.6 percent, an initial cash outflow of $42,100, and cash inflows of $16,500 in Year 1, $11,700 in Year 2, and $10,400 in Year 4. What is the net present value?

更多留学生实用工具

智能学习助手

风格化写作助手

论文查重助手

文献引用助手

课堂转译助手

课堂笔记助手

Quiz搜索助手

学校历年真题

智能刷题助手

智能匹配练习

希望你的学习变得更简单