For restrictive covenants to reduce moral hazard, they must be:

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

Restrictive covenants reduce moral hazard only when there is credible monitoring and enforcement — therefore they must be monitored and enforced (answer c).

1. Relevant knowledge points and concepts
- Moral hazard arises when a party protected from risk (e.g., a borrower, insured party, or manager) has incentives to take actions that are costly to the other party because those actions are not fully observable or punishable.
- Restrictive covenants are contractual rules that limit behavior (e.g., financial ratios, limits on additional debt, or restrictions on asset sales) intended to align incentives.
- For covenants to change behavior, breaches must be observed and sanctions applied; otherwise the covenant is merely a promise without bite.

2. Step-by-step reasoning
- If a covenant exists but no one checks compliance, the protected party can violate it with impunity; expected benefit of violation exceeds expected cost → moral hazard persists.
- Monitoring makes violations observable. Enforcement (penalties, acceleration, legal remedies) converts observed violations into real costs for the violator.
- The presence of monitoring plus credible enforcement changes the expected payoff calculation: the cost of violating (likelihood of detection × severity of sanction) can outweigh the benefit of opportunistic behavior, deterring moral hazard.

3. Calculations
- No numerical calculation is required here; the logic is comparative-static: with enforcement, expected cost of violation > expected benefit → compliance increases.

4. Why the correct answer is correct
- Only active monitoring and enforcement create the credible threat necessary to deter opportunistic actions. They turn contractual language into an effective incentive device.

5. Why other options are incorrect
- (a) Impossible to remove: Permanence is neither necessary nor realistic; durability alone won’t stop hidden violations without enforcement.
- (b) Easily changed: If covenants are easily changed, credibility is undermined and moral hazard may increase.
- (d) Written in all capitals: Formatting has no effect on incentives or detectability.

Conclusion: Because monitoring and credible enforcement are required to deter opportunistic behavior, the correct choice is c. monitored and enforced.

For restrictive covenants to reduce moral hazard, they must be:Single choice

Similar Questions

Expansionary fiscal policy in an open economy with a floating exchange rate will likely:

Contractionary monetary policy in an open economy with a floating exchange rate will likely:

Contractionary monetary policy in an open economy with a fixed exchange rate will likely ____ a trade surplus.

Which is expansionary monetary policy?

Which is contractionary fiscal policy?

Which is expansionary fiscal policy?

What would raise aggregate supply (AS)?

What would shift aggregate supply (AS) to the right?

More Practical Tools for Students Powered by AI Study Helper

Homework AI Solver

Stylized AI Paper Writer

Plagiarism Checker Assistant

Citation AI Academic Writing Tool

In-Class Translation Assistant

AI Note Generator

AI Quiz Answers

Past Exam Questions from University Test Bank

Smart Practice Assistant

Adaptive Practice

Making Your Study Simpler