In R, after running a logistic model
𝑚
𝑦
log
𝑖
𝑡
, what does
exp
(
𝑐
𝑜
𝑒
𝑓
(
𝑚
𝑦
log
𝑖
𝑡
)
)
provide?

Question

In R, after running a logistic model 
𝑚
𝑦
log
𝑖
𝑡
, what does 
exp
(
𝑐
𝑜
𝑒
𝑓
(
𝑚
𝑦
log
𝑖
𝑡
)
)
 provide?

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

Logistic regression coefficients represent log-odds, so exponentiating them converts those log-odds into multiplicative effects on the odds (odds ratios).

1) Relevant knowledge points and concepts
- A binary logistic model uses the logit link: logit(p) = log(p/(1−p)) = β0 + β1x1 + ... + βkxk.
- The fitted coefficients βj are log-odds changes: a one-unit increase in xj changes the log-odds by βj.
- Exponentiating a coefficient gives exp(βj), which is the odds ratio associated with a one-unit increase in xj (i.e., the factor by which the odds are multiplied).

2) Step-by-step reasoning
- Start from the model: log(p/(1−p)) = β0 + β1x1 + ...
- If xj increases by 1, the linear predictor increases by βj, so the new odds = exp(β0 + ... + βj*(xj+1) + ...) = exp(βj) * exp(original linear predictor).
- Therefore exp(βj) is the ratio: (new odds) / (original odds) = odds after 1-unit increase divided by odds before.

3) Example calculation (intermediate steps shown)
- Suppose β1 = 0.5. Then exp(β1) = exp(0.5) ≈ 1.6487.
- Interpretation: a one-unit increase in x1 multiplies the odds by ≈1.65 (a 65% increase in the odds).
- If β2 = −0.7 then exp(β2) = exp(−0.7) ≈ 0.4966, meaning the odds are multiplied by ≈0.50 (a 50% decrease).

4) Why the correct answer is correct
- exp(coef(model)) applies exp to each βj, converting log-odds to odds ratios. This is the standard interpretation of logistic regression coefficients and is exactly what that R expression returns.

5) Why the other options are incorrect
- The log-likelihood is a scalar given by logLik(model), not exp(coef()). 
- Predicted probabilities are obtained via plogis(predict(model)) or predict(..., type="response"), not by exponentiating coefficients.
- The odds of an event for a specific observation are exp(linear predictor) = exp(β0 + Σβj xj); exp(coef()) gives ratios (effects) not the actual odds for an observation.

6) Conclusion
Exp(coef(m_ylogit)) yields the Odds Ratios. This matches the provided correct answer: The Odds Ratios.

In R, after running a logistic model 𝑚 𝑦 log 𝑖 𝑡 , what does exp ( 𝑐 𝑜 𝑒 𝑓 ( 𝑚 𝑦 log 𝑖 𝑡 ) ) provide?单项选择题

类似问题

Question at position 6 In a logistic regression model of customer churn (unsubscribing), a positive coefficient for a price means that as that price increases, the predicted probability of customer churn always increases.TrueFalse

What type of outcome does logistic regression predict?

What is the probability of occurrence of the event given the coefficients below for 1 inbound call and 1 tech visit (assume gender identity is coded as 0 for this observation).

In the R script for Logistic Regression, what argument is required in 𝑔 𝑙 𝑚 ( ) to specify a logistic model?

If the coefficient of 'Income' in a logistic regression is 0.005, and the Odds Ratio is 1.005, what happens when income increases by 1 unit?

In the Logistic Regression model for predicting churn based on number of complaints, if a customer has 0 complaints and the constant is -2.57, what is the estimated odds of churning?

In a logistic regression, if the predicted logit function is 0, what's the transformed probability?

更多留学生实用工具

智能学习助手

风格化写作助手

论文查重助手

文献引用助手

课堂转译助手

课堂笔记助手

Quiz搜索助手

学校历年真题

智能刷题助手

智能匹配练习

希望你的学习变得更简单