Which of the following is TRUE regarding high-intensity interval training (HIIT)?

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

Recovery of the phosphagen (ATP–PCr) system requires roughly 3–5 minutes to approach full restoration, so rest interval length is a primary determinant of the quality and repeatability of high‑intensity efforts — this underlies the correct statement that the type of exercise chosen is less important than having appropriate 3–5 minute rest intervals for true all‑out HIIT work.

Relevant knowledge points and concepts:
- HIIT is defined by repeated bouts of very high‑intensity work interspersed with recovery; training effects depend on intensity, work duration, and rest duration.
- Energy system recovery: the ATP–PCr system replenishes rapidly but not instantaneously; PCr half‑time ≈ 30 s.
- Different interval protocols (Tabata, sprint intervals, repeated sprints) use different work:rest ratios depending on the targeted energy system and desired adaptation.

Step‑by‑step reasoning with calculations:
1. If PCr half‑time ≈ 30 s, then after t seconds the fraction unrecovered ≈ (1/2)^(t/30). Recovery fraction = 1 − (1/2)^(t/30).
2. For t = 180 s (3 min): number of half‑lives = 180/30 = 6. Recovery ≈ 1 − (1/2)^6 = 1 − 1/64 = 63/64 ≈ 98.4%.
3. For t = 300 s (5 min): 300/30 = 10 half‑lives → recovery ≈ 1 − (1/2)^10 = 1 − 1/1024 ≈ 99.9%.
4. Shorter rests (e.g., 10–30 s) do not restore PCr and therefore shift emphasis to glycolytic or aerobic metabolism; long rests (~3–5 min) allow near‑full PCr recovery and permit repeated maximal efforts.

Why the correct answer is correct:
- Because the ability to produce repeated near‑maximal efforts in HIIT depends primarily on restoring the immediate energy stores; therefore, selecting an exercise mode (running, cycling, rowing) is secondary to providing appropriate rest when the goal is repeated maximal performance. A 3–5 minute rest is commonly cited to allow substantial PCr recovery and high quality of subsequent intervals.

Why the other options are incorrect:
- "HIIT should be practiced 4–5 days per week." Too frequent; HIIT is typically performed 2–3 times weekly to allow recovery and reduce injury/overtraining risk.
- "Warming up is not as important with HIIT." False; thorough warm‑up is essential before high‑intensity efforts to prepare the cardiovascular system, muscles, and nervous system and reduce injury risk.
- "HIIT is an excellent form of exercise because it causes few injuries." Misleading; HIIT can be effective but may carry higher injury risk if performed too often, with poor technique, or without adequate progression and recovery.

Conclusion: The correct choice is "The type of exercise one chooses to do is not as important as a rest interval of 3–5 minutes." This matches the provided answer.

Which of the following is TRUE regarding high-intensity interval training (HIIT)?Single choice

Similar Questions

Expansionary fiscal policy in an open economy with a floating exchange rate will likely:

Contractionary monetary policy in an open economy with a floating exchange rate will likely:

Contractionary monetary policy in an open economy with a fixed exchange rate will likely ____ a trade surplus.

Which is expansionary monetary policy?

Which is contractionary fiscal policy?

Which is expansionary fiscal policy?

What would raise aggregate supply (AS)?

What would shift aggregate supply (AS) to the right?

More Practical Tools for Students Powered by AI Study Helper

Homework AI Solver

Stylized AI Paper Writer

Plagiarism Checker Assistant

Citation AI Academic Writing Tool

In-Class Translation Assistant

AI Note Generator

AI Quiz Answers

Past Exam Questions from University Test Bank

Smart Practice Assistant

Adaptive Practice

Making Your Study Simpler