A treaty is similar to a contract in two ways. One way is that both treaties and contracts are attempts by parties to determine rights and obligations among themselves. The other is that failure to obey a treaty or contract results in:Single choice
A
recidivism.
B
liability.
C
eminent domain.
D
redundancy.

Question

A treaty is similar to a contract in two ways. One way is that both treaties and contracts are attempts by parties to determine rights and obligations among themselves. The other is that failure to obey a treaty or contract results in:Single choice

A

recidivism.

B

liability.

C

eminent domain.

D

redundancy.

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

Liability arises when parties fail to fulfill legally binding obligations, so it is the correct consequence for both treaties and contracts.

1. Relevant knowledge points and concepts:
- Contract: a legally enforceable agreement between private parties creating rights and obligations; breach gives rise to civil remedies (damages, specific performance, restitution).
- Treaty: a binding agreement between states (or international actors) under international law; breach triggers state responsibility and obligations to make reparation.
- Liability: legal responsibility for failure to perform obligations; can take the form of monetary damages, reparations, sanctions, or other remedies depending on the legal regime.

2. Step-by-step reasoning:
- The stem already notes both instruments aim to determine rights and obligations. The natural consequence of failing to obey a legal obligation is that the delinquent party becomes legally responsible for the breach.
- In private law, breach of contract => contract liability: the injured party may claim damages or specific performance in a court.
- In public/international law, breach of treaty => state responsibility/liability: under the International Law Commission’s Articles on State Responsibility, a wrongful act entails legal consequences, including the duty to make full reparation.

3. (No numerical calculations are required for this legal reasoning problem.)

4. Why the correct answer is correct:
- “Liability” captures the general legal consequence across both domains: responsibility to remedy harm or face legal remedies. It is the broad, appropriate legal term applicable to both treaties (international liability/reparations) and contracts (civil liability/damages).

5. Why the other options are incorrect:
- Recidivism: refers to repeated criminal offending; unrelated to the consequences of breaching an agreement.
- Eminent domain: a government power to take private property for public use with compensation; not a consequence of breach.
- Redundancy: means unnecessary repetition or job loss in employment contexts; irrelevant to legal breach.

Conclusion: The correct answer is liability, which matches the provided answer.

A treaty is similar to a contract in two ways. One way is that both treaties and contracts are attempts by parties to determine rights and obligations among themselves. The other is that failure to obey a treaty or contract results in:Single choice

Similar Questions

A country’s sovereignty can be challenged if it violates international human rights laws.

Global law regulates business practices between: Blank ______.

A binding agreement between two states or international organizations is known as:

Which institution deals with individuals charged with genocide, war crimes and crimes against humanity?

International treaties:

In "Nuremberg's Legacy" Eve Darian-Smith argued that the post-war trials at Nuremberg revolutionized the field of law. Nuremberg's legacy heralded... (select more than one)

More Practical Tools for Students Powered by AI Study Helper

Homework AI Solver

Stylized AI Paper Writer

Plagiarism Checker Assistant

Citation AI Academic Writing Tool

In-Class Translation Assistant

AI Note Generator

AI Quiz Answers

Past Exam Questions from University Test Bank

Smart Practice Assistant

Adaptive Practice

Making Your Study Simpler