What was the main finding in Perez et al. (2024) and their study on Black solidarity with other people of color?

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

Question restatement: What was the main finding in Perez et al. (2024) and their study on Black solidarity with other people of color?

Option 1: 'Shared discrimination between Latinos and Blacks led to support for pro-racial minority policies, which was mediated by solidarity with people of color.' This aligns with a central claim that experiencing shared discrimination can foster solidarity across racial groups, which in turn translates into greater backing for policies benefiting racial minorities. The mediation via solidarity with people of color explains the mechanism by which discrimination experiences translate into policy support. This option presents a coherent sequence: discrimination exposure → increased cross-group solidarity → augmented support for pro-minority policies.

Option 2: 'Shared discrimination between Latinos and Blacks led to a decrease in support for pro-racial minority policies.' This reverses the expected directional effect. The literature on intergroup contact and perceived threat often shows that shared experiences can enhance intergroup cooperation and policy support, not reduce it. Unless there is a stated countervailing mechanism, this option is inconsistent with the described mediating role of solidarity and the positive policy-support outcome.

Option 3: 'Shared discrimination between Latinos and Blacks led to support for pro-racial minority policies, which was NOT significantly mediated by any other variable.' If the study highlighted solidarity with people of color as a mediator, then asserting there was no significant mediation contradicts the reported mechanism. This would imply a direct effect only, which would be at odds with a mediation model highlighting a mediator variable.

Option 4: 'Shared discrimination between Latinos and Blacks led to support for pro-racial minority policies, which was mediated by empathic concerns of outgroup members.' While empathic concern could plausibly be a mediator in some studies, the specified main finding emphasizes solidarity with people of color as the mediator. Unless the study explicitly tested empathic concerns and found mediation there, this option adds a mediator that is not indicated as the primary pathway in the reported result.

Synthesis across options: The most faithful reconstruction of the reported main finding is the positive link between shared discrimination and policy support, operating through a mediator capturing cross-group solidarity. The other options either invert the effect, deny mediation, or propose a different mediator not identified as the primary mechanism in the study.

Contextual note: When interpreting mediation in intergroup research, identifying a plausible and tested mediator is crucial. Here, solidarity with people of color functions as the bridge between shared discrimination experiences and policy support, distinguishing it from a direct effect or alternative mediators that were not supported by the reported findings.

What was the main finding in Perez et al. (2024) and their study on Black solidarity with other people of color?单项选择题

类似问题

According to Pérez, Vicuña, and Ramos (2023), when is solidarity between Black Americans and other people of color most likely to emerge?

You own a bond that pays $64 in interest annually. The face value is $1,000 and the current market price is $1,021.61. The bond matures in 11 years. What is the yield to maturity?

Which of the following statements is CORRECT?

It will cost $9,600 to acquire an ice cream cart that is expected to produce cash inflows of $3,600 a year for three years. After the three years, the cart is expected to be worthless. What is the payback period?

更多留学生实用工具

智能学习助手

风格化写作助手

论文查重助手

文献引用助手

课堂转译助手

课堂笔记助手

Quiz搜索助手

学校历年真题

智能刷题助手

智能匹配练习

希望你的学习变得更简单