Question29 Assume that the exchange rate was AU$1.25/US$1 at 31/12/2006. One year later the exchange rate changed to AU$1/US$1. The rate of return in terms of US$ on the US$ assets was 10% from 12/31/2006 to 12/31/2007. What was the effective rate of return in terms of AU$ earned by this FI on the US$ assets? Select one alternative: a. -12% b. -10% c. +8% d. +10% e. +20% ResetMaximum marks: 3 Flag question undefinedSingle choice
A
a. -12%
B
b. -10%
C
c. +8%
D
d. +10%
E
e. +20%

Question

Question29 Assume that the exchange rate was AU$1.25/US$1 at 31/12/2006. One year later the exchange rate changed to AU$1/US$1. The rate of return in terms of US$ on the US$ assets was 10% from 12/31/2006 to 12/31/2007. What was the effective rate of return in terms of AU$ earned by this FI on the US$ assets? Select one alternative: a. -12% b. -10% c. +8% d. +10% e. +20% ResetMaximum marks: 3 Flag question undefinedSingle choice

A

a. -12%

B

b. -10%

C

c. +8%

D

d. +10%

E

e. +20%

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

To analyze the problem, we first restate the given numbers and what needs to be compared.

- At 31/12/2006, the exchange rate is AU$1.25 per US$1. This means 1 USD costs 1.25 AU$. If the FI starts with US$1 of assets, the AU$ outlay is 1.25 AU$.
- One year later, the rate is AU$1 per US$1, i.e., 1 USD costs 1.00 AU$. The US$ assets earn 10% in USD terms over the year, so the ending value in USD is 1 × (1 + 0.10) = 1.10 USD.
- We want the effective rate of return in AU$ earned by the FI on the US$ assets, i.e., the growth of the AU$ value of the investment from initial AU$ outlay to the AU$ value at the end.

Now we evaluate each option and explain the reasoning behind it.

Option a: -12%
- Initial AU$ outlay: 1.25 AU$ for 1 USD.
- End value in AU$: 1.10 USD × 1.00 AU$/USD = 1.10 AU$.
- AU$ return: 1.10 − 1.25 = −0.15 AU$.
- Percentage return in AU$: (−0.15) / 1.25 = −0.12 = −12%.
- This matches the math above, so this option is consistent with the data.

Option b: -10%
- A −10% AU$ return would imply ending AU$ value of 1.25 × (1 − 0.10) = 1.125 AU$.
- However, the actual end value in AU$ is 1.10 AU$, not 1.125 AU$.
- Therefore this option misstates the outcome.

Option c: +8%
- An 8% gain would give an end AU$ value of 1.25 × 1.08 = 1.35 AU$ if computing from the same initial outlay, which is far from the actual end value of 1.10 AU$.
- This contradicts the given USD return and exchange-rate movement.

Option d: +10%
- A 10% AU$ gain would correspond to an end value of 1.25 × 1.10 = 1.375 AU$, again not matching the actual 1.10 AU$ end value.
- The USD return of 10% together with the depreciating AU$ value per USD leads to a loss in AU$ terms, not a gain.

Option e: +20%
- A 20% AU$ gain implies an end value of 1.25 × 1.20 = 1.50 AU$, which is clearly inconsistent with the end value determined from the USD return and the end exchange rate.

In summary, the only option that aligns with: (i) USD assets growing by 10%, and (ii) the change in AU$ per US$ from 1.25 to 1.00, is a negative AU$ return of −12%. The reasoning shows how the currency depreciation against the AU$ affects the AU$ value of USD-denominated assets, producing a loss in AU$ terms despite a positive USD return.

Similar Questions

An American manufacturer with its corporate headquarters in New York City is purchasing goods from a French supplier. Which of the following statements is true regarding the exchange rate risk for this contract?

An Indonesian student’s family purchased an apartment for AUD 1 million in the Melbourne CBD area for their son to stay in during his study at Monash College. The contract will be settled in 6 months. Which of the following statements is true regarding the exchange rate risk for the family?

An American manufacturer with its corporate headquarters in New York City is purchasing goods from a French supplier. Which of the following statements is true regarding the exchange rate risk for this contract?

An Indonesian student’s family purchased an apartment for AUD 1 million in the Melbourne CBD area for their son to stay in during his study at Monash College. The contract will be settled in 6 months. Which of the following statements is true regarding the exchange rate risk for the family?

A Japanese manufacturer with its corporate headquarters in Tokyo is purchasing goods from a French supplier. Which of the following statements is true regarding the exchange rate risk for this contract?

An American manufacturer with its corporate headquarters in New York City is purchasing goods from a French supplier. Which of the following statements is true regarding the exchange rate risk for this contract?

An American manufacturer with its corporate headquarters in New York City is purchasing goods from a French supplier. Which of the following statements is true regarding the exchange rate risk for this contract?

More Practical Tools for Students Powered by AI Study Helper

Homework AI Solver

Stylized AI Paper Writer

Plagiarism Checker Assistant

Citation AI Academic Writing Tool

In-Class Translation Assistant

AI Note Generator

AI Quiz Answers

Past Exam Questions from University Test Bank

Smart Practice Assistant

Adaptive Practice

Making Your Study Simpler