A portfolio manager is creating a bond fund with an ESG tilt. In constructing the portfolio, the manager will:

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

Sovereign bond universes are typically smaller than corporate bond universes when an ESG tilt is applied because there are far fewer eligible sovereign issuers and more exclusionary constraints (country-level ESG, currency, liquidity) than for corporate issuers.

1. Relevant knowledge points and concepts
- ESG tilt: a portfolio weighting that favors higher-ESG–scoring issuers rather than strict exclusions; it reduces the effective investable universe by screening on environmental, social, and governance criteria.
- Sovereign versus corporate bond markets: sovereigns = national governments (limited number of issuers); corporates = thousands of firms across sectors and countries (much broader issuance).
- Practical constraints: local-currency issuance, liquidity, and emerging-market sovereigns often fail ESG screens or are excluded for currency/liquidity reasons.
- Green bond labeling: voluntary standards (e.g., ICMA Green Bond Principles) exist but no single universal ranking system.

2. Step-by-step reasoning
- Start with the ESG tilt: manager screens bonds by ESG metrics. That excludes some issuers.
- Compare issuer counts: there are ~200 sovereign issuers (countries) versus many thousands of corporate issuers—so screening removes a larger proportion of sovereign options.
- Add practical filters (currency, liquidity, credit quality): many sovereigns issue only in local currency or thinly traded bonds, further shrinking the sovereign investable set.
- Corporates, by contrast, offer more issuance across sectors, currencies, and maturities, giving more choices to construct an ESG-tilted portfolio.

3. Intermediate steps (qualitative)
- Apply ESG screen → eliminate low-scoring sovereigns (e.g., weak governance, human-rights concerns).
- Exclude illiquid/local-currency sovereigns → remaining sovereign universe becomes very small.
- Corporate universe still has many eligible issuers and green-labeled issues to tilt toward.

4. Why the correct answer is correct
Because ESG filters plus market and liquidity constraints reduce the number of suitable sovereign bond issuers much more than they do corporate issuers, the investable sovereign universe is smaller.

5. Why other options are incorrect
- "Be limited to short-term maturities to avoid climate risk": ESG/climate risk may influence duration, but managers are not inherently limited to short-term maturities; long-term bonds can be included if ESG criteria are met.
- "Be able to select green bonds based on a universally accepted ranking system": no universally accepted ranking exists; there are principles and frameworks but not a single global ranking.

6. Conclusion
The correct answer is that the manager will have a smaller investable universe to select from sovereign bonds compared to corporate bonds, which matches the provided answer.

A portfolio manager is creating a bond fund with an ESG tilt. In constructing the portfolio, the manager will:单项选择题

类似问题

What are the three pillars that ESG investing considers alongside traditional financial metrics?

Why are ESG factors important in bond investing?

An asset owner seeking to hire an investment manager believes that ESG factors are most important for risk management. To implement that belief, the asset manager will most likely suggest a strategy that:

Which of the following is least likely a way for a fund manager to demonstrate identification of ESG risk and opportunity, according to the PLSA?

For which type of ESG activity would it be easiest to evaluate the impact on a portfolio's performance?

Which is the most common ESG factor in strategic asset allocation?

Which of the following ESG factors is most often considered in strategic asset allocation?

Which of the following statements best describes discretionary ESG investment strategies?

更多留学生实用工具

智能学习助手

风格化写作助手

论文查重助手

文献引用助手

课堂转译助手

课堂笔记助手

Quiz搜索助手

学校历年真题

智能刷题助手

智能匹配练习

希望你的学习变得更简单