Question at position 17 Reducing negative environmental impacts in a green value chain involves:Minimizing pollution and harmful emissions.Increasing waste generation.Expanding production without limits.Using non-renewable resources.

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

Minimizing pollution and harmful emissions.

1. Relevant knowledge points and concepts
- A green value chain integrates environmental considerations into all stages of a product’s lifecycle: sourcing, production, distribution, use, and end-of-life.
- Reducing negative environmental impacts means lowering resource depletion, pollution, greenhouse gas emissions, and waste while promoting energy efficiency and renewable inputs.
- Key strategies include pollution prevention, cleaner production, waste reduction, recycling/circularity, and switching to renewable energy.

2. Step-by-step reasoning
- Step 1: Define “reducing negative environmental impacts” as actions that lessen harm to ecosystems, human health, and climate (e.g., lower emissions, less toxic effluent).
- Step 2: Evaluate each option against that definition.
  - “Minimizing pollution and harmful emissions” directly targets emissions and toxic discharges, reducing air, water, and soil contamination and greenhouse gases.
  - “Increasing waste generation” increases environmental burden, contradicting reduction goals.
  - “Expanding production without limits” typically raises resource use and emissions, worsening impacts unless strictly decoupled (which is not stated).
  - “Using non-renewable resources” increases depletion and often raises lifecycle emissions, contrary to green principles.
- Step 3: Conclude which option aligns with reducing negative impacts: minimizing pollution and harmful emissions.

3. Calculations
- No numerical calculations are required; this is a conceptual evaluation. The logical comparison shows one option is consistent with mitigation of environmental harm.

4. Why the correct answer is correct
- Minimizing pollution and harmful emissions is a direct and established approach within green value chains to reduce environmental impacts through cleaner technologies, emission controls, and process improvements.

5. Why other options are incorrect
- Increasing waste generation increases impacts; expanding production without limits tends to increase resource use and emissions; using non-renewable resources perpetuates extraction and emissions. None of these reduce negative impacts.

6. Conclusion
The correct choice is “Minimizing pollution and harmful emissions.” This matches the provided answer.

Question at position 17 Reducing negative environmental impacts in a green value chain involves:Minimizing pollution and harmful emissions.Increasing waste generation.Expanding production without limits.Using non-renewable resources.Single choice

Similar Questions

Sustainable solutions should aim to be:

Question at position 8 Reducing negative environmental impacts in a green value chain involves:↳Expanding production without limits.↳Using non-renewable resources.↳Increasing waste generation.Minimizing pollution and harmful emissions.

When evaluating a new project, firms should include in the projected cash flows all of the following EXCEPT:

Provide the best rationale for what's wrong with supply chains today?

What is Blockchain and how is it relevant to supply chain management?

More Practical Tools for Students Powered by AI Study Helper

Homework AI Solver

Stylized AI Paper Writer

Plagiarism Checker Assistant

Citation AI Academic Writing Tool

In-Class Translation Assistant

AI Note Generator

AI Quiz Answers

Past Exam Questions from University Test Bank

Smart Practice Assistant

Adaptive Practice

Making Your Study Simpler