You are trying to design a new test of the psychological construct "impulsivity". You find that scores on your new test of impulsivity correlate extremely highly with scores on an existing and well-validated test of the distinct and largely unrelated psychological construct "spatial ability". Your new impulsivity test has a problem with

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

Discriminant validity (also called divergent validity) refers to the extent to which a measure does not correlate strongly with measures of different, unrelated constructs. It is a subtype of construct validity showing that the test is capturing a unique construct rather than overlapping with other constructs.

1. Relevant knowledge points and concepts
- Discriminant (divergent) validity: low correlations with measures of different constructs.
- Content validity: whether test items adequately sample the domain of the construct.
- Criterion validity: whether the test correlates with an outcome or criterion it should predict (concurrent or predictive validity).
- Face validity: whether the test appears to measure the construct on its surface.

2. Step-by-step reasoning process
Step 1: Identify the constructs. New test = impulsivity; existing validated test = spatial ability (distinct and largely unrelated). Step 2: Specify the expected pattern if the new test is valid: scores on impulsivity should show low correlation with spatial ability because they measure different constructs. Step 3: Observe the actual pattern: the new impulsivity test correlates extremely highly with spatial ability. Step 4: Interpret: a high correlation with an unrelated construct indicates the new test is not discriminating between constructs and therefore lacks discriminant validity.

3. Intermediate steps / logic shown
- Hypothesis for good discriminant validity: correlation between impulsivity and spatial ability ≈ near zero or low.
- Observed: correlation is extremely high → contradiction of hypothesis → problem in discriminant validity.
No numerical calculation is required; the logical inconsistency is sufficient.

4. Why the correct answer is correct
Because discriminant validity specifically concerns whether a measure is distinct from other constructs. A high correlation with an unrelated construct indicates overlap or mismeasurement, directly signaling poor discriminant validity.

5. Why other options are incorrect
- A. Content validity: this concerns item coverage of impulsivity’s domain, not correlation with unrelated constructs.  
- B. Criterion validity: pertains to prediction of relevant outcomes, not correlation with a different construct like spatial ability.  
- D. Face validity: is about superficial appearance; a high empirical correlation with another construct is not what face validity addresses.

6. Conclusion
The new impulsivity test has a problem with C. Discriminant validity. This matches the provided answer.

Similar Questions

Which of the following statements about the main model of personality disorders in the DSM-5 is untrue?

Dimensional models of personality disorder:

Roughly, how many people in the world meet criteria for at least one DSM Personality Disorder?

The following patterns of affect, cognition, and behaviour are noted in those diagnosed with Borderline Personality Disorder, EXCEPT:

What are the three core features of Personality Disorders, as identified in the lecture?

Which of these is a responsibility of Australian citizens aged 18 years or over?[Fill in the blank]

What are the colours of the Australian Aboriginal Flag?[Fill in the blank]

More Practical Tools for Students Powered by AI Study Helper

Homework AI Solver

Stylized AI Paper Writer

Plagiarism Checker Assistant

Citation AI Academic Writing Tool

In-Class Translation Assistant

AI Note Generator

AI Quiz Answers

Past Exam Questions from University Test Bank

Smart Practice Assistant

Adaptive Practice

Making Your Study Simpler