The Independent Planning Commission is the consent authority for State Significant Development only in certain circumstances. Which of the following is not one of those circumstances?

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

First, let’s list what the question is asking: identify which option is NOT one of the circumstances that would make the Independent Planning Commission (IPC) the consent authority for State Significant Development.
Option a: 'where the proposed development includes a building over 25 storeys tall' — This statement asserts a height-based threshold as a trigger for IPC involvement. In many planning frameworks, tall buildings can qualify as State Significant Development or may require IPC involvement under specific rules, but the key point here is whether height alone is listed as a trigger in the given circumstances. If the official list of triggers does not include height as a criterion, this option would be the candidate for 'not one of those circumstances.'
Option b: 'where a reportable political donation has been made' — In several planning regimes, reportable political donations can trigger heightened scrutiny or the IPC stepping in to assess a SSD proposal, since donations are treated as a potential governance concern. This makes it a plausible circumstance for IPC involvement.
Option c: 'where 50 or more unique public objections have been received' — A large number of public objections is a recognized trigger in some planning processes to escalate the level of assessment and involve a higher authority like the IPC to ensure a robust decision.
Option d: 'where the relevant local council has objected' — When a local council objects to a SSD application, it commonly triggers IPC consideration or involvement, reflecting the tension between local planning controls and state-level oversight.
Analyzing each choice, we see that options b, c, and d describe governance or procedural triggers that are often cited as reasons for IPC involvement in SSD matters. Each reflects a scenario where the IPC would take over or participate in the consent process to resolve the SSD application with state-level oversight.
Conversely, option a centers on a building height (over 25 storeys) but does not, in this framing, present a described trigger tied to IPC consent authority. If the specification in the question’s context does not list height as a declared trigger for IPC involvement, then option a is the one that does not belong to the set of IPC-trigger circumstances.
In short, options b, c, and d align with common IPC triggers (donations, substantial public objections, and council objections), whereas option a relates to a physical attribute (height) that, by the prompt’s framing, is not identified as one of the IPC’s triggering circumstances for SSD consent.

The Independent Planning Commission is the consent authority for State Significant Development only in certain circumstances. Which of the following is not one of those circumstances?Single choice

Similar Questions

Choose a, b, c or d as the best answer.2. Which statement would the author, most probably, agree with?

Question9Question 9Inline Choice Question Try selecting one of the choices from the drop down menu: The capital of New South Wales is [select: , Melbourne, Sydney, Tasmania, Brisbane]. ResetMaximum marks: 1 Flag question undefined

Question9Question 9Inline Choice Question Try selecting one of the choices from the drop down menu: The capital of New South Wales is [select: , Brisbane, Melbourne, Tasmania, Sydney]. ResetMaximum marks: 1 Flag question undefined

Question9Question 9Inline Choice Question Try selecting one of the choices from the drop down menu: The capital of New South Wales is [select: , Brisbane, Sydney, Tasmania, Melbourne]. ResetMaximum marks: 1 Flag question undefined

Question9Question 9Inline Choice Question Try selecting one of the choices from the drop down menu: The capital of New South Wales is [select: , Tasmania, Brisbane, Sydney, Melbourne]. ResetMaximum marks: 1 Flag question undefined

Question 30 Choose a, b, c or d as the best answer. The author’s main argument is that the 100:80:100 model __________.

More Practical Tools for Students Powered by AI Study Helper

Homework AI Solver

Stylized AI Paper Writer

Plagiarism Checker Assistant

Citation AI Academic Writing Tool

In-Class Translation Assistant

AI Note Generator

AI Quiz Answers

Past Exam Questions from University Test Bank

Smart Practice Assistant

Adaptive Practice

Making Your Study Simpler