Below is an entity-relationship diagram for a relational database: Which best describes the relationship between customers and sales?

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

First, let’s restate the scenario and options to ensure clarity about the relationship:
- Question: Below is an entity-relationship diagram for a relational database: Which best describes the relationship between customers and sales?
- Answer options:
  a. A customer can only make one sale.
  b. A customer can make many sales.
  c. One sale can belong to many customers.
  d. A customer can buy other customers.

Now, evaluate each option in light of typical relational database conventions as depicted by the diagram:
Option A: A customer can only make one sale.
- This would imply a one-to-one or one-to-many relationship in which each customer is associated with exactly one sale. However, the diagram shows a Customer entity connected to Sales with a line that indicates a single customer can be linked to multiple sale records, not restricted to just one. Therefore this statement is not aligned with the diagram’s cardinality.

Option B: A customer can make many sales.
- This corresponds to a one-to-many relationship where one customer can have multiple related sales entries in the Sales table. In typical retail schemas, each sale (or order) has a CustomerID pointing back to the customer, allowing many sales per customer. This matches the conventional interpretation of the relationship and the diagram’s structure.

Option C: One sale can belong to many customers.
- This describes a many-to-many or one-to-many reverse scenario, which would require a different link pattern (e.g., a sale linked to multiple customers). In standard relational design, a sale record usually reflects a single customer through a foreign key (CustomerID). The diagram does not indicate a sale being associated with multiple customers, so this option is incorrect.

Option D: A customer can buy other customers.
- This statement introduces an illogical and unsupported interpretation (customers purchasing other customers). It does not reflect a legitimate relational attribute of customers and sales in a typical database and is clearly not implied by the diagram.

To summarize the reasoning across all options in a varied way: The diagram’s cardinality shows that a customer can be linked to multiple sales entries, which is precisely a one-to-many pattern from Customer to Sales. The other choices either imply a one-to-one constraint, a reverse or multi-customer linkage to a single sale, or an interaction that makes no sense in the context of customers purchasing products.

Thus, the option that best describes the relationship is: a one-to-many interpretation where a single customer can have many associated sales records, which is captured by option B: A customer can make many sales.

Below is an entity-relationship diagram for a relational database: Which best describes the relationship between customers and sales?单项选择题

类似问题

Once you added the tables to build a relationship, you then [选择] converted dragged right-clicked the relevant field from one table to the relevant field in the other table.

The main form shows the [选择] many one side of the relationship and the subform shows the [选择] one many side of the relationship.

What is the purpose of the relationship feature in a table?

4 . What is the relationship between employees and managers?

In the figure shown below, which of the following business rules would apply?

When creating relationships between tables in Access, the two cardinality types used by the software are and .

What was the world's first widely adopted biodiversity policy?

The aim of the Paris Agreement is to ensure that the earth’s preindustrial temperature is not exceeded by more than º Celsius.

更多留学生实用工具

智能学习助手

风格化写作助手

论文查重助手

文献引用助手

课堂转译助手

课堂笔记助手

Quiz搜索助手

学校历年真题

智能刷题助手

智能匹配练习

希望你的学习变得更简单