APP 6 requires that personal information used for secondary purposes must:

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

Question restatement: APP 6 requires that personal information used for secondary purposes must be aligned with the original purpose for collection. Now, let's evaluate each option in turn.

Option A: 'Be used in a way that is consistent with the primary purpose of collection.' This aligns with APP 6, which generally requires that secondary use be compatible with the purpose for which the information was originally collected. The reasoning is that if the new use remains within the expectations of the original purpose, it is permissible under the typical regulatory framework.

Option B: 'Be anonymised to protect the individual’s privacy.' While anonymisation can enhance privacy, APP 6 does not mandate anonymisation for all secondary uses. There are many scenarios where personal information can be used for secondary purposes without full anonymisation, provided the use remains consistent with the primary purpose or is otherwise allowed under an exception. Therefore this option is too restrictive and not a universal requirement.

Option C: 'Be used only after obtaining explicit consent from the individual.' Explicit consent is one pathway for secondary use, but APP 6 does not require explicit consent for every secondary purpose. There are other lawful bases or permissible related-use provisions that do not rely solely on explicit consent, such as the use being reasonably necessary or directly related to the primary purpose. Hence, this option is not universally correct.

Option D: 'Be kept confidential from all third parties.' While protecting information is important, forcing confidentiality from all third parties is not accurate. In practice, information may be disclosed to third parties (e.g., service providers, contractors) under appropriate protections and with proper governance, as long as the disclosure is within the scope of the original purpose or a permitted secondary-use exception. Thus, this statement is overly restrictive and not accurate as a general rule.

In summary, option A accurately reflects the core requirement that secondary-use of personal information should be consistent with the primary purpose of collection, while options B, C, and D propose restrictions or conditions that are not universal or required in all circumstances.

APP 6 requires that personal information used for secondary purposes must:Single choice

Similar Questions

The General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) primarily embodies which ethical framework?

The question of whether a manufacturer has rights to utilize data collected from a health monitoring device to improve future versions of the product is a concern of:

What does privacy legislation such as the Australian Privacy Act 1988 enable individuals to control?

Which legal risk is associated with the collection of user-generated data?

Canada's PIPEDA (Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents Act) contains rules regarding all the following except

What is the primary focus of APP 1?

How should personal information be collected?

When should an APP entity destroy or de-identify personal information?

More Practical Tools for Students Powered by AI Study Helper

Homework AI Solver

Stylized AI Paper Writer

Plagiarism Checker Assistant

Citation AI Academic Writing Tool

In-Class Translation Assistant

AI Note Generator

AI Quiz Answers

Past Exam Questions from University Test Bank

Smart Practice Assistant

Adaptive Practice

Making Your Study Simpler