A seventy-year-old woman, using the escalator at the airport, dropped a glove. When she attempted to pick it up, she lost her balance and fell. As a result of the accident, she suffered a fractured arm. In an action by her against the company that had the responsibility for maintaining the escalator, the defendant company will argue which of the following for its best defence?Single choice
A
It did not manufacture the escalator
B
The woman is liable because of contributory negligence
C
Injuries suffered on an escalator are not reasonably foreseeable
D
There are no damages
E
It does not owe those who ride the escalator a duty of care
Log in for full answers
We've collected over 50,000 authentic original questions and detailed explanations from around the globe. Log in now and get instant access to the answers!
Similar Questions
Which of the following statements is correct about contributory negligence?
If the defendant (‘D’) in a negligent case successfully proves the defence of contributory negligence by the plaintiff (‘P’), which is correct.
The history of the Nation of Islam (NOI) reveals that they seek recruits from prison.
Malcolm was president of his 6th grade class, he was one of several Blacks students in his school; a straight “A” student, and well like by his peers.
More Practical Tools for Students Powered by AI Study Helper
Making Your Study Simpler
Join us and instantly unlock extensive past papers & exclusive solutions to get a head start on your studies!