Selling or sharing the University's teaching materials with private tutoring or ghostwriting companies is considered contract cheating

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

Contract cheating is when assessed work is completed, in whole or in part, by a third party and submitted as a student’s own. University teaching materials are designed for learning and assessment; selling or passing them to private tutoring or ghostwriting companies gives those third parties the resources to produce or market bespoke answers, model responses, or finished assessments on a student’s behalf. That facilitation meets the core definition of contract cheating.

1) Relevant concepts: academic integrity, contract cheating, facilitation of misconduct, and intellectual property. Contract cheating covers both directly commissioning someone to do assessed work and enabling third parties (e.g., ghostwriters or tutoring firms) to produce or distribute assessed solutions. University materials are often covered by intellectual property and assessment-security policies.

2) Step-by-step reasoning:
- Define contract cheating: outsourcing assessed work to others.
- Identify the described act: selling or sharing teaching materials with private tutoring/ghostwriting companies.
- Connect the act to the definition: those companies can use the materials to produce, tailor, or sell completed assessments or answer sets, thereby enabling other students to submit third-party work.
- Therefore, the act is not merely a harmless sharing of resources but an action that facilitates outsourcing of assessed work.

3) No numerical calculations apply; the logical mapping above is the complete chain of inference.

4) Why this is correct: the critical element of contract cheating is the involvement of an external party producing assessed content. By supplying those external parties with official teaching/assessment materials, you materially assist or permit contract cheating to occur, violating academic conduct rules.

5) Why “False” is incorrect: it would ignore the facilitation element. Even if the seller isn’t directly completing work, providing materials to ghostwriting/tutoring firms materially contributes to contract cheating.

In summary, the correct answer is True, which matches the provided answer.

Selling or sharing the University's teaching materials with private tutoring or ghostwriting companies is considered contract cheatingTrue/False

Similar Questions

Posting a question to a website offering 'tutoring help' and then submitting the answer they provide:

Uploading the University's copyright teaching materials such as unit of study outlines, lecture slides and assignment questions to 'study notes' sharing websites so that you can access documents uploaded by other students is considered contract cheating and incurs serious penalties.

Students using the guide prepared by the tutoring group to complete the assignment could be accused of:

True or false: if a service markets itself to students as a 'tutoring' service or 'exam helper', it is not a contract cheating service and it is legitimate.

Which of the following could be classified as contract cheating? (select all answers that apply)

What was the world's first widely adopted biodiversity policy?

The aim of the Paris Agreement is to ensure that the earth’s preindustrial temperature is not exceeded by more than º Celsius.

The IPCC's mission is to Blank ______.

More Practical Tools for Students Powered by AI Study Helper

Homework AI Solver

Stylized AI Paper Writer

Plagiarism Checker Assistant

Citation AI Academic Writing Tool

In-Class Translation Assistant

AI Note Generator

AI Quiz Answers

Past Exam Questions from University Test Bank

Smart Practice Assistant

Adaptive Practice

Making Your Study Simpler