What does Pylyshyn take his “mysterious box with unknown contents” example to show?

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

First, let's restate the question and the answer options to ensure clarity about what is being assessed.
Question: What does Pylyshyn take his “mysterious box with unknown contents” example to show?
Answer options:
1) That the human mind is ultimately no different than a computer
2) That we must know Morse code in order to do cognitive science
3) That observed behavioral regularities in normal circumstances may be misleading guides when we want to understand the system's cognitive architecture
4) That it is never possible for us to really know what is going on inside a cognitive system

Now, evaluate each option in turn, connecting them to Pylyshyn’s underlying argument about cognitive science and the limits of behavior alone.
Option 1: This claims the mind and computer are ultimately the same. Pylyshyn challenges simplistic identity theories by pointing to the possibility that identical external behavior can arise from different internal structures; the box analogy is used to argue for internal processes beyond what is observable behaviorally. Thus, this option misrepresents his point, which is not an assertion of complete mind–computer identity.
Option 2: The idea that Morse code knowledge is required to do cognitive science is irrelevant to Pylyshyn’s broader critique. He does not argue for a specific prerequisite like Morse code; rather, he critiques relying on surface behavior to infer internal mechanisms. Therefore, this option is misaligned with his actual point.
Option 3: This states that observed behavioral regularities in normal circumstances may be misleading guides when we want to understand the system's cognitive architecture. This aligns with Pylyshyn’s argument: the mysterious box shows that what we observe in behavior does not necessarily reveal the internal representations or processes, so caution is needed when inferring architecture from behavior alone. This is the core lesson the box is used to illustrate.
Option 4: Saying it is never possible to know what is going on inside a cognitive system overstates the claim. Pylyshyn does not deny the possibility of knowledge about internal mechanisms; he emphasizes limits of relying solely on behavior to infer them. This absolutist statement mischaracterizes his position and is therefore inaccurate.

In summary, the analysis shows that options 1 and 2 misstate the main thrust, option 4 overreaches what can be known about internal states, and option 3 accurately captures the intended teaching of the mysterious box analogy by highlighting the potential disconnect between observable behavior and internal cognitive architecture.

What does Pylyshyn take his “mysterious box with unknown contents” example to show?单项选择题

类似问题

What was the world's first widely adopted biodiversity policy?

The aim of the Paris Agreement is to ensure that the earth’s preindustrial temperature is not exceeded by more than º Celsius.

The IPCC's mission is to Blank ______.

Why have most international agreements for environmental protection been based on the honor system?

As was exhibited with the Montreal Protocol and the encouragement of reduced CFC production, trade can be an effective tool to compel compliance with international treaties.

The Stockholm Declaration and UNEP were the result of the Blank ______ first conference on the Human Environment in 1972.

In addition to the direct mission of the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species (CITES), why was CITES so important?

President Trump hiring a corporate leader from the oil and gas industry to head the Department of Energy is an example of regulatory ; one intention behind this was to change environmental policy.

更多留学生实用工具

智能学习助手

风格化写作助手

论文查重助手

文献引用助手

课堂转译助手

课堂笔记助手

Quiz搜索助手

学校历年真题

智能刷题助手

智能匹配练习

希望你的学习变得更简单