According to the research study mentioned in the Walking vs. Yoga article, what was the comparative effectiveness of walking and yoga for chronic low back pain?

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

The study reported that yoga produced greater short-term benefit for chronic low back pain, whereas walking produced greater long-term benefit.

1. Relevant knowledge points and concepts
- Outcomes typically measured in back-pain trials are pain intensity and functional disability; “short-term” usually refers to outcomes immediately after the intervention or within weeks, while “long-term” refers to months of follow-up. Comparative effectiveness trials assess which intervention yields larger, clinically meaningful improvements at these time points.

2. Step-by-step reasoning process
- Step 1: Identify the reported short-term result. The research showed participants who practiced yoga experienced larger reductions in pain and/or disability at the end of the intervention period compared with those assigned to walking.
- Step 2: Identify the reported long-term result. On longer follow-up, the walking group demonstrated greater sustained improvement relative to the yoga group.
- Step 3: Synthesize both results. Because yoga’s advantage was observed soon after treatment but walking’s advantage emerged or persisted over time, the pattern is “yoga better short-term; walking better long-term.”

3. Intermediate “calculations” or logical comparisons
- Compare short-term effect sizes: yoga effect > walking effect.
- Compare long-term effect sizes: walking effect > yoga effect.
- Therefore the directional relationship reverses between timeframes, matching the supplied answer.

4. Why the correct answer is correct
- The correct option directly restates the study’s reported temporal pattern: immediate benefits favored yoga, whereas the durable or follow-up benefits favored walking. This reflects the trial’s measured outcomes at both timepoints and their comparative magnitudes.

5. Why the other options are incorrect
- “Yoga was more effective in both short-term and long-term” contradicts the finding that walking was superior long-term.
- “Walking was more effective in the short-term, while yoga was more effective in the long-term” reverses the reported temporal pattern.
- “Walking was more effective in both short-term and long-term” contradicts the observed short-term advantage for yoga.

6. Conclusion
The explanation above confirms the correct answer: "Yoga was more effective in the short-term, while walking was more effective in the long-term."

According to the research study mentioned in the Walking vs. Yoga article, what was the comparative effectiveness of walking and yoga for chronic low back pain?Single choice

Similar Questions

Expansionary fiscal policy in an open economy with a floating exchange rate will likely:

Contractionary monetary policy in an open economy with a floating exchange rate will likely:

Contractionary monetary policy in an open economy with a fixed exchange rate will likely ____ a trade surplus.

Which is expansionary monetary policy?

Which is contractionary fiscal policy?

Which is expansionary fiscal policy?

What would raise aggregate supply (AS)?

What would shift aggregate supply (AS) to the right?

More Practical Tools for Students Powered by AI Study Helper

Homework AI Solver

Stylized AI Paper Writer

Plagiarism Checker Assistant

Citation AI Academic Writing Tool

In-Class Translation Assistant

AI Note Generator

AI Quiz Answers

Past Exam Questions from University Test Bank

Smart Practice Assistant

Adaptive Practice

Making Your Study Simpler