Which of the following approaches would NOT meet the criteria for informative business writing?

Question

Which of the following approaches would NOT meet the criteria for informative business writing?

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

Informative business writing prioritizes objective, accurate, audience-centered information presented clearly and without advocacy, so any approach that shifts toward persuasion or advocacy fails the criteria.

Relevant knowledge points and concepts:
- Purpose: Informative writing aims to convey facts, explanations, or instructions so the audience can understand or act, not to change beliefs.
- Tone and ethics: Neutral, transparent, and accurate language builds trust and allows readers to draw their own conclusions.
- Readability: Clear formatting (headings, bullets) and relevant data improve comprehension.
- Distinction: Informative vs. persuasive writing—persuasion seeks to influence attitudes or choices.

Step-by-step reasoning:
1. Option A: "Providing objective data relevant to the audience's needs." This directly aligns with the core purpose—giving factual, audience-focused information—so it meets the criteria.
2. Option B: "Ensuring accuracy, transparency, and a neutral tone." Those are hallmark requirements of informative business writing; accuracy and neutrality are essential, so this meets the criteria.
3. Option C: "Persuading the audience to adopt the writer's opinion on a controversial issue." Persuasion and advocacy aim to change beliefs or decisions; on a controversial issue this introduces bias and departs from neutrality and objectivity. Therefore this does NOT meet the criteria.
4. Option D: "Using clear formatting (headings, bullet points) to increase readability." This is a practical technique to make information accessible and adheres to informative-writing standards.

Why the correct answer is correct:
Persuading readers to adopt an opinion inherently conflicts with the informative aims of neutrality and factual presentation. Informative business writing should present evidence and options, not advocate for a controversial stance.

Why the other options are incorrect choices for "would NOT meet": Options A, B, and D all support objectivity, accuracy, and clarity, so they do meet the criteria.

Conclusion: The correct choice is "Persuading the audience to adopt the writer's opinion on a controversial issue," which matches the provided answer.

Which of the following approaches would NOT meet the criteria for informative business writing?单项选择题

类似问题

Which of the following best describes the primary purpose of informative business writing?

An effective LinkedIn article should:

Match the type of written communication with its closest description. 1: Proposal 2: Email 3: Memo 4: Progress Report 5: Resume

Opening: Getting Attention

To seek shared benefits with my audience, especially for the written document(s), my group and I have to consider Sauder School mission, vision, and values.

According to your textbook, the five People-First Communication skills are considered foundational to effective strategic business writing.

Name the Supreme Court decision that removed financial constraints on PACs.

Political scientists Joshua Kalla and David Broockman find that senior policy makers made themselves available to _____ between three and four times more often than they did to constituents.

更多留学生实用工具

智能学习助手

风格化写作助手

论文查重助手

文献引用助手

课堂转译助手

课堂笔记助手

Quiz搜索助手

学校历年真题

智能刷题助手

智能匹配练习

希望你的学习变得更简单