In the lecture and subject materials for Week 8, we looked at a few different case studies: 2D:4D "finger ratio" research (below); a scene from Mad Men; the example of the YouTube channel 'Interior Motives,' where a panel try to guess the gender, sexuality, age and location of the person based on a photo of their bedroom; a poll about whether or not the lecturer has a "gay sounding" voice. Thinking specifically about the finger ratio research, why is the 2D:4D finger-ratio narrative especially apt for a Foucauldian critique?Single choice

Question Image
A

It eliminates the need for classification.

B

It shows science is always neutral.

C

It proves sexuality is purely cultural and never bodily.

D

It exemplifies biopolitical reasoning: bodily metrics are recruited to certify identity as natural and measurable.

Log in for full answers

We've collected over 50,000 authentic original questions and detailed explanations from around the globe. Log in now and get instant access to the answers!

Similar Questions

More Practical Tools for Students Powered by AI Study Helper

Join us and instantly unlock extensive past papers & exclusive solutions to get a head start on your studies!