In the lecture and subject materials for Week 8, we looked at a few different case studies: 2D:4D "finger ratio" research (below); a scene from Mad Men; the example of the YouTube channel 'Interior Motives,' where a panel try to guess the gender, sexuality, age and location of the person based on a photo of their bedroom; a poll about whether or not the lecturer has a "gay sounding" voice. Thinking specifically about the finger ratio research, why is the 2D:4D finger-ratio narrative especially apt for a Foucauldian critique?Single choice

A
It eliminates the need for classification.
B
It shows science is always neutral.
C
It proves sexuality is purely cultural and never bodily.
D
It exemplifies biopolitical reasoning: bodily metrics are recruited to certify identity as natural and measurable.
Log in for full answers
We've collected over 50,000 authentic original questions and detailed explanations from around the globe. Log in now and get instant access to the answers!
Similar Questions
Is the following statement true or false? In the products of methylation-hydrolysis, every -OH group corresponds to the position of a glycosidic bond in the starting polysaccharide.
Which of the follwoing structures represents amylopectin?
Which of the following is true about an aldopentose?I. It is a monosaccharide.II. It contains a CHO groupIII. It is a disaccharide.IV. It is an oligosaccharide.
For stock A, we have 𝛽 𝑖 = 0.70. Suppose the expected market risk premium next year is 9% and the risk-free rate is 3%. What is the expected return of this stock based on the CAPM? (Please answer in % and round to 2 decimal places. If the answer is 8.057%, then in the box, write 8.06)
More Practical Tools for Students Powered by AI Study Helper
Making Your Study Simpler
Join us and instantly unlock extensive past papers & exclusive solutions to get a head start on your studies!