An AI model is deployed in a pilot study despite known but unmitigated risks of systematic misclassification in a minority subgroup.
Which ethical principle is primarily compromised?

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

Non-maleficence—the obligation to avoid causing harm—is the primary principle compromised here. Non-maleficence is commonly stated as “do no harm” and requires that practitioners and developers refrain from actions that foreseeably injure individuals or groups.

Relevant knowledge points and concepts:
- Non-maleficence: duty to prevent or minimize foreseeable harm.
- Foreseeability: if a risk is known and unmitigated, harm is foreseeable.
- Systematic misclassification: leads to concrete harms (wrong diagnoses, inappropriate treatment, denied services).
- Other ethical principles (justice, autonomy, transparency) are related but address different primary concerns.

Step-by-step reasoning:
1) The scenario states a known, unmitigated risk of systematic misclassification affecting a minority subgroup. That establishes foreseeability of harm.  
2) Deploying the model in a pilot study despite that knowledge means actors accepted or ignored preventable risk.  
3) Systematic misclassification can cause direct harms (clinical mismanagement, denial of resources, psychological harm), so deployment exposes individuals to harm.  
4) The ethical duty most directly violated by knowingly exposing people to foreseeable harms is non-maleficence.

Why the correct answer is correct:
- Non-maleficence focuses on preventing harm; knowingly deploying a system that will systematically misclassify a vulnerable subgroup is a direct breach of that duty. The actors had information allowing mitigation but proceeded, which is antithetical to “do no harm.”

Why the other options are less correct:
- Justice deals with fairness and equitable distribution of benefits/risks. While relevant (minority subgroup harmed), the immediate issue is causing harm rather than distributive fairness per se.  
- Autonomy concerns informed consent and self-determination; only implicated if subjects were not informed, but the core wrongdoing is harm.  
- Transparency concerns openness about functioning/risks; lack of transparency can worsen harm, but the principal ethical violation remains the infliction of foreseeable harm.

Conclusion: The primary ethical principle compromised is Non-maleficence, which matches the provided answer.

An AI model is deployed in a pilot study despite known but unmitigated risks of systematic misclassification in a minority subgroup. Which ethical principle is primarily compromised?Single choice

Similar Questions

Why has principlism from medical ethics been especially influential in AI ethics?

According to John Tasioulas in his paper "Artificial Intelligence, Humanistic Ethics", which was a reading in this subject, what is one major problem with treating AI ethics mainly as a matter of optimization and preference satisfaction?

Please enter the completion code you received after passing the UNSW College Student AI Module with 100%. The code you received is case sensitive so you must make sure to copy it directly.

More Practical Tools for Students Powered by AI Study Helper

Homework AI Solver

Stylized AI Paper Writer

Plagiarism Checker Assistant

Citation AI Academic Writing Tool

In-Class Translation Assistant

AI Note Generator

AI Quiz Answers

Past Exam Questions from University Test Bank

Smart Practice Assistant

Adaptive Practice

Making Your Study Simpler